FCC Overseas Quota Fee Medical Colleges
The Federal Constitutional Court on Wednesday dismissed a set of appeals filed by medical students in Sindh who sought permission to pay tuition fees in Pakistani rupees despite having secured admission under the foreign or overseas quota, a category that requires payment in foreign currency.
Upholding earlier judgments, the court affirmed that students admitted under the overseas quota are bound by the financial and regulatory conditions attached to that category. The decision reinforces existing rules governing admissions to medical and dental colleges and closes the door on attempts to retrospectively alter fee arrangements after enrollment.
Also Read: FPSC CSS Examination 2026 Compulsory Paper Per Day Announced
The case was heard by a three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan. The appeals challenged an earlier ruling of the Sindh High Court, which had rejected the students’ writ petitions.
Dispute over quota and fee structure
According to court proceedings, the students had obtained admission to medical colleges in Sindh during the 2022–23 academic year under the foreign or overseas quota. This quota, regulated by the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council, reserves a portion of seats—generally between five and 15 percent—for international students and overseas Pakistanis. Admissions under this category follow a separate merit list and carry substantially higher fees, payable in foreign currency.
After paying these fees for two academic years, the students approached the High Court, arguing that they should be allowed to switch to payment in local currency. They contended that they had completed their entire education in Pakistan and therefore should not be treated as overseas candidates for fee purposes.
Arguments before the court
Counsel for the students, Shahab Sarki, told the bench that the universities themselves had placed the petitioners under the overseas quota despite their domestic educational background. He further argued that the medical regulator had relied on publicly displayed show-cause notices instead of formally serving them on the students, raising questions about due process.
The students’ counsel maintained that applicants should not be penalized for administrative mistakes made by universities. As an alternative remedy, he suggested that the students could be adjusted against seats in other institutions rather than being compelled to continue paying higher foreign-currency fees.
On the other side, PMDC’s counsel, Jahangir Jadun, disputed these claims. He informed the court that the students had voluntarily applied under the overseas quota at the time of admission and had accepted the terms attached to that category. He added that responsibility for any incorrect placement rested jointly with both the students and the admitting institutions.
Court records show that the students had paid overseas quota fees without objection for two years before seeking judicial intervention.
Court’s findings
After hearing both sides, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that the High Court’s judgment was legally sound. The bench held that students who knowingly seek admission under a specific quota cannot later disown its conditions once it becomes financially inconvenient.
Also Read: 28th Convocation at IoBM: Celebrating Success and Honoring Milestones
In its ruling, the court emphasized that allowing a post-admission switch in fee structure would undermine the integrity of the quota system and create uncertainty for regulators and institutions. It also noted that any deviation from established rules could set a precedent affecting thousands of future admissions.
The appeals were dismissed in their entirety.
Broader impact on medical admissions
Legal analysts say the decision sends a clear signal that courts are unlikely to interfere in regulatory frameworks governing professional education unless there is clear evidence of mala fide intent or gross procedural violations.
Officials familiar with medical admissions noted that overseas quota seats are priced higher to cross-subsidize local students and to attract foreign exchange. Permitting students to retrospectively convert these seats into local-fee admissions could disrupt financial planning for medical colleges.
What comes next
The ruling is expected to guide future disputes involving quota-based admissions, particularly in professional institutions. Universities and regulators may now face increased pressure to ensure greater transparency at the admission stage to avoid similar litigation.
For students, the judgment underscores the importance of understanding the long-term implications of applying under specialized quotas. Any change to the current framework, legal experts say, would now need to come through regulatory reform rather than the courts.
